نمونه پاسخ به داوران مقاله؛ متن آماده Response to Reviewers انگلیسی و فارسی

Dear Editor,

We would like to sincerely thank you and the reviewers for the careful evaluation of our manuscript entitled “[عنوان مقاله]”. We appreciate the constructive comments and suggestions, which helped us improve the quality and clarity of the manuscript.

We have revised the manuscript accordingly and provide below a point-by-point response to each comment. All changes have been incorporated into the revised manuscript.

Reviewer 1 - Comment 1: The introduction should better explain the research gap and clarify the novelty of the study.

Response: Thank you for this valuable comment. We agree that the research gap required further clarification. We have revised the Introduction section and added a paragraph explaining the gap in previous studies and the specific contribution of the present study.

Reviewer 1 - Comment 2: The methodology section needs more details about the sampling procedure and data analysis.

Response: Thank you for pointing this out. We have expanded the Methodology section by adding more details about the sampling procedure, inclusion criteria, and data analysis process.

Reviewer 2 - Comment 1: Some recent references should be added to strengthen the discussion.

Response: We appreciate this helpful suggestion. We have added several recent references and revised the Discussion section to better connect our findings with the current literature.

We hope that the revised manuscript and our responses adequately address the reviewers’ concerns. Thank you again for your consideration.

Sincerely,
[نام نویسنده مسئول]

Reviewer’s Comment: Please revise the abstract to clearly state the main findings of the study.

Response: Thank you for this helpful suggestion. We have revised the abstract and added a clearer statement of the main findings.

Reviewer’s Comment: The methodology section does not provide sufficient information about the sampling strategy, inclusion criteria, and validity of the measurement instrument.

Response: We sincerely thank the reviewer for this important comment. We agree that the methodology section required further clarification. In the revised manuscript, we have substantially expanded this section by adding detailed information about the sampling strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the validity and reliability of the measurement instrument.

Reviewer’s Comment: The authors should add a new quantitative analysis to support the findings.

Response: We sincerely thank the reviewer for this valuable suggestion. We carefully considered the possibility of adding a new quantitative analysis. However, the present study was designed as a qualitative study, and adding a quantitative analysis would not be consistent with the research design and the nature of the collected data.

To address the reviewer’s concern, we have added a clearer explanation of the study design and its limitations in the revised manuscript.